低侵襲性手術器具の世界市場予測(~2027)

• 英文タイトル:Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Research Report by Product, End-User, Application, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Research Report by Product, End-User, Application, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19「低侵襲性手術器具の世界市場予測(~2027)」(市場規模、市場予測)調査レポートです。• レポートコード:MRC2301C012
• 出版社/出版日:360iResearch / 2022年10月
• レポート形態:英語、PDF、227ページ
• 納品方法:Eメール(受注後2-3日)
• 産業分類:医療機器
• 販売価格(消費税別)
  Single User(1名利用、印刷可)¥742,350 (USD4,949)▷ お問い合わせ
  Enterprise License(企業利用、印刷可)¥1,492,350 (USD9,949)▷ お問い合わせ
• ご注文方法:お問い合わせフォーム記入又はEメールでご連絡ください。
• お支払方法:銀行振込(納品後、ご請求書送付)
レポート概要
360iResearch社の本報告書によると、2021年に23.26億ドルであった世界の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模が、2022年に25.61億ドルになり、2027年まで年平均10.27%で成長して41.83億ドルに達すると予測されています。本資料では、低侵襲性手術器具の世界市場について調査・分析し、序論、調査方法、エグゼクティブサマリー、市場概要、市場インサイト、製品別(電気手術用器具、ガイディングデバイス、ハンドヘルド器具、インフレーションシステム)分析、エンドユーザー別(外来外科クリニック、病院、研究機関)分析、用途別(心臓血管、美容外科、腹腔鏡検査、脳神経外科、産科&婦人科)分析、地域別(南北アメリカ、アメリカ、カナダ、ブラジル、アジア太平洋、日本、中国、インド、韓国、台湾、ヨーロッパ/中東/アフリカ、イギリス、ドイツ、フランス、ロシア、その他)分析、競争状況、企業情報などの構成でまとめています。なお、本レポートには、Abbott Laboratories、Applied Medical Resources Corporation、B. Braun Melsungen AG、Boston Scientific Corporation、CONMED Corporation、Ethicon USA, LLC、GE Healthcare、HOYA Corporation、Intuitive Surgical Inc.、Johnson & Johnson、Koninklijke Philips NV、Medtronic PLCなどの企業情報があります。
・序論
・調査方法
・エグゼクティブサマリー
・市場概要
・市場インサイト
・世界の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模:製品別
- 電気手術器具の市場規模
- ガイディングデバイスの市場規模
- ハンドヘルド器具の市場規模
- インフレーションシステムの市場規模
・世界の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模:エンドユーザー別
- 外来外科クリニックにおける市場規模
- 病院における市場規模
- 研究機関における市場規模
・世界の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模:用途別
- 心臓血管における市場規模
- 美容外科における市場規模
- 腹腔鏡検査における市場規模
- 脳神経外科における市場規模
- 産科&婦人科における市場規模
・世界の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模:地域別
- 南北アメリカの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
アメリカの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
カナダの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
ブラジルの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
...
- アジア太平洋の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
日本の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
中国の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
インドの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
韓国の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
台湾の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
...
-ヨーロッパ/中東/アフリカの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
イギリスの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
ドイツの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
フランスの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
ロシアの低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
...
-その他地域の低侵襲性手術器具市場規模
・競争状況
・企業情報

The Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market size was estimated at USD 23.26 billion in 2021 and expected to reach USD 25.61 billion in 2022, and is projected to grow at a CAGR 10.27% to reach USD 41.83 billion by 2027.

Market Statistics:
The report provides market sizing and forecast across 7 major currencies – USD, EUR, JPY, GBP, AUD, CAD, and CHF. It helps organization leaders make better decisions when currency exchange data is readily available. In this report, the years 2018 and 2020 are considered as historical years, 2021 as the base year, 2022 as the estimated year, and years from 2023 to 2027 are considered as the forecast period.

Market Segmentation & Coverage:
This research report categorizes the Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments to forecast the revenues and analyze the trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Based on Product, the market was studied across Electrosurgical Instrument, Guiding Device, Handheld Instrument, and Inflation System. The Electrosurgical Instrument is further studied across Electrocautery Device, Electrosurgical Generator, and Electrosurgical Instrument & Accessories. The Guiding Device is further studied across Guidewire and Guiding Catheter. The Handheld Instrument is further studied across Auxiliary Instrument, Dilator, Forceps & Spatula, Grasper, Retractor, Suture, Visualizing Scope, and Cutter Instrument. The Auxiliary Instrument is further studied across Cannula, Clamp, Closure Device, and Stapler. The Cutter Instrument is further studied across Rasp and Trocar. The Inflation System is further studied across Balloons Dilator & Inflator and Insufflator & Insufflator Needle.

Based on End-User, the market was studied across Ambulatory Surgical Clinic, Hospital, and Research Institute.

Based on Application, the market was studied across Cardiovascular, Cosmetic Surgery, Laparoscopy, Neurosurgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ophthalmology, Orthopedic Surgery, and Urology.

Based on Region, the market was studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Cumulative Impact of COVID-19:
COVID-19 is an incomparable global public health emergency that has affected almost every industry, and the long-term effects are projected to impact the industry growth during the forecast period. Our ongoing research amplifies our research framework to ensure the inclusion of underlying COVID-19 issues and potential paths forward. The report delivers insights on COVID-19 considering the changes in consumer behavior and demand, purchasing patterns, re-routing of the supply chain, dynamics of current market forces, and the significant interventions of governments. The updated study provides insights, analysis, estimations, and forecasts, considering the COVID-19 impact on the market.

Cumulative Impact of 2022 Russia Ukraine Conflict:
We continuously monitor and update reports on political and economic uncertainty due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Negative impacts are significantly foreseen globally, especially across Eastern Europe, European Union, Eastern & Central Asia, and the United States. This contention has severely affected lives and livelihoods and represents far-reaching disruptions in trade dynamics. The potential effects of ongoing war and uncertainty in Eastern Europe are expected to have an adverse impact on the world economy, with especially long-term harsh effects on Russia.This report uncovers the impact of demand & supply, pricing variants, strategic uptake of vendors, and recommendations for Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments market considering the current update on the conflict and its global response.

Competitive Strategic Window:
The Competitive Strategic Window analyses the competitive landscape in terms of markets, applications, and geographies to help the vendor define an alignment or fit between their capabilities and opportunities for future growth prospects. It describes the optimal or favorable fit for the vendors to adopt successive merger and acquisition strategies, geography expansion, research & development, and new product introduction strategies to execute further business expansion and growth during a forecast period.

FPNV Positioning Matrix:
The FPNV Positioning Matrix evaluates and categorizes the vendors in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market based on Business Strategy (Business Growth, Industry Coverage, Financial Viability, and Channel Support) and Product Satisfaction (Value for Money, Ease of Use, Product Features, and Customer Support) that aids businesses in better decision making and understanding the competitive landscape.

Market Share Analysis:
The Market Share Analysis offers the analysis of vendors considering their contribution to the overall market. It provides the idea of its revenue generation into the overall market compared to other vendors in the space. It provides insights into how vendors are performing in terms of revenue generation and customer base compared to others. Knowing market share offers an idea of the size and competitiveness of the vendors for the base year. It reveals the market characteristics in terms of accumulation, fragmentation, dominance, and amalgamation traits.

Competitive Scenario:
The Competitive Scenario provides an outlook analysis of the various business growth strategies adopted by the vendors. The news covered in this section deliver valuable thoughts at the different stage while keeping up-to-date with the business and engage stakeholders in the economic debate. The competitive scenario represents press releases or news of the companies categorized into Merger & Acquisition, Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership, New Product Launch & Enhancement, Investment & Funding, and Award, Recognition, & Expansion. All the news collected help vendor to understand the gaps in the marketplace and competitor’s strength and weakness thereby, providing insights to enhance product and service.

Company Usability Profiles:
The report profoundly explores the recent significant developments by the leading vendors and innovation profiles in the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, including Abbott Laboratories, Applied Medical Resources Corporation, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Boston Scientific Corporation, CONMED Corporation, Ethicon USA, LLC, GE Healthcare, HOYA Corporation, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Koninklijke Philips NV, Medtronic PLC, Olympus Corporation, Siemens Healthineers, Smith & Nephew PLC, Stryker Corporation, and Zimmer Biomet.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:
1. Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the key players
2. Market Development: Provides in-depth information about lucrative emerging markets and analyze penetration across mature segments of the markets
3. Market Diversification: Provides detailed information about new product launches, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certification, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players
5. Product Development & Innovation: Provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments

The report answers questions such as:
1. What is the market size and forecast of the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market?
2. What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 shaping the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market during the forecast period?
3. Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the forecast period in the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market?
4. What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market?
5. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market?
6. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market?
7. What modes and strategic moves are considered suitable for entering the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market?

レポート目次

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Limitations
1.7. Assumptions
1.8. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology
2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights
5.1. Market Dynamics
5.1.1. Drivers
5.1.1.1. Higher acceptance of minimally invasive surgeries over traditional surgeries
5.1.1.2. Prevalence of surgeries owing to lifestyle and chronic disorders
5.1.1.3. Continuous advancement in the minimal invasive surgical instruments
5.1.2. Restraints
5.1.2.1. Dearth of skilled professionals
5.1.3. Opportunities
5.1.3.1. Collaborative landscape to support R&D
5.1.3.2. Potential in emerging economies
5.1.4. Challenges
5.1.4.1. Loosely defined regulations and limited reimbursement policies
5.2. Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

6. Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, by Product
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Electrosurgical Instrument
6.3.1. Electrocautery Device
6.3.2. Electrosurgical Generator
6.3.3. Electrosurgical Instrument & Accessories
6.3. Guiding Device
6.4.1. Guidewire
6.4.2. Guiding Catheter
6.4. Handheld Instrument
6.5.1. Auxiliary Instrument
6.5.2.1. Cannula
6.5.2.2. Clamp
6.5.2.3. Closure Device
6.5.2.4. Stapler
6.5.2. Dilator
6.5.3. Forceps & Spatula
6.5.4. Grasper
6.5.5. Retractor
6.5.6. Suture
6.5.7. Visualizing Scope
6.5.8. Cutter Instrument
6.5.9.1. Rasp
6.5.9.2. Trocar
6.5. Inflation System
6.6.1. Balloons Dilator & Inflator
6.6.2. Insufflator & Insufflator Needle

7. Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, by End-User
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Ambulatory Surgical Clinic
7.3. Hospital
7.4. Research Institute

8. Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, by Application
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Cardiovascular
8.3. Cosmetic Surgery
8.4. Laparoscopy
8.5. Neurosurgery
8.6. Obstetrics and Gynecology
8.7. Ophthalmology
8.8. Orthopedic Surgery
8.9. Urology

9. Americas Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Argentina
9.3. Brazil
9.4. Canada
9.5. Mexico
9.6. United States

10. Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Australia
10.3. China
10.4. India
10.5. Indonesia
10.6. Japan
10.7. Malaysia
10.8. Philippines
10.9. Singapore
10.10. South Korea
10.11. Taiwan
10.12. Thailand
10.13. Vietnam

11. Europe, Middle East & Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Denmark
11.3. Egypt
11.4. Finland
11.5. France
11.6. Germany
11.7. Israel
11.8. Italy
11.9. Netherlands
11.10. Nigeria
11.11. Norway
11.12. Poland
11.13. Qatar
11.14. Russia
11.15. Saudi Arabia
11.16. South Africa
11.17. Spain
11.18. Sweden
11.19. Switzerland
11.20. Turkey
11.21. United Arab Emirates
11.22. United Kingdom

12. Competitive Landscape
12.1. FPNV Positioning Matrix
12.1.1. Quadrants
12.1.2. Business Strategy
12.1.3. Product Satisfaction
12.2. Market Ranking Analysis, By Key Player
12.3. Market Share Analysis, By Key Player
12.4. Competitive Scenario
12.4.1. Merger & Acquisition
12.4.2. Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership
12.4.3. New Product Launch & Enhancement
12.4.4. Investment & Funding
12.4.5. Award, Recognition, & Expansion

13. Company Usability Profiles
13.1. Abbott Laboratories
13.1.1. Business Overview
13.1.2. Key Executives
13.1.3. Product & Services
13.2. Applied Medical Resources Corporation
13.2.1. Business Overview
13.2.2. Key Executives
13.2.3. Product & Services
13.3. B. Braun Melsungen AG
13.3.1. Business Overview
13.3.2. Key Executives
13.3.3. Product & Services
13.4. Boston Scientific Corporation
13.4.1. Business Overview
13.4.2. Key Executives
13.4.3. Product & Services
13.5. CONMED Corporation
13.5.1. Business Overview
13.5.2. Key Executives
13.5.3. Product & Services
13.6. Ethicon USA, LLC
13.6.1. Business Overview
13.6.2. Key Executives
13.6.3. Product & Services
13.7. GE Healthcare
13.7.1. Business Overview
13.7.2. Key Executives
13.7.3. Product & Services
13.8. HOYA Corporation
13.8.1. Business Overview
13.8.2. Key Executives
13.8.3. Product & Services
13.9. Intuitive Surgical Inc.
13.9.1. Business Overview
13.9.2. Key Executives
13.9.3. Product & Services
13.10. Johnson & Johnson
13.10.1. Business Overview
13.10.2. Key Executives
13.10.3. Product & Services
13.11. Koninklijke Philips NV
13.11.1. Business Overview
13.11.2. Key Executives
13.11.3. Product & Services
13.12. Medtronic PLC
13.12.1. Business Overview
13.12.2. Key Executives
13.12.3. Product & Services
13.13. Olympus Corporation
13.13.1. Business Overview
13.13.2. Key Executives
13.13.3. Product & Services
13.14. Siemens Healthineers
13.14.1. Business Overview
13.14.2. Key Executives
13.14.3. Product & Services
13.15. Smith & Nephew PLC
13.15.1. Business Overview
13.15.2. Key Executives
13.15.3. Product & Services
13.16. Stryker Corporation
13.16.1. Business Overview
13.16.2. Key Executives
13.16.3. Product & Services
13.17. Zimmer Biomet
13.17.1. Business Overview
13.17.2. Key Executives
13.17.3. Product & Services

14. Appendix
14.1. Discussion Guide
14.2. License & Pricing




• 英文レポート名:Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Research Report by Product, End-User, Application, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19
• 日本語訳:低侵襲性手術器具の世界市場予測(~2027)
• レポートコード:MRC2301C012お問い合わせ(見積依頼・ご注文・質問)